<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet href="https://www.stuarttaylorjr.com/wp-content/themes/getnoticed/inc/feeds/style.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Stuart Taylor, Jr.NewsHour Impeachment Coverage:  Analysis and Commentary &#8211; The President&#8217;s Defense &#8211; Stuart Taylor, Jr.</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.stuarttaylorjr.com/content-newshour-impeachment-coverage-analysis-and-commentary-presidents-defense-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.stuarttaylorjr.com</link>
	<description>Online Archive</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2021 13:35:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
		<item>
		<title>NewsHour Impeachment Coverage:  Analysis and Commentary &#8211; The President&#8217;s Defense</title>
		<link>https://www.stuarttaylorjr.com/content-newshour-impeachment-coverage-analysis-and-commentary-presidents-defense-2/</link>
		<comments>https://www.stuarttaylorjr.com/content-newshour-impeachment-coverage-analysis-and-commentary-presidents-defense-2/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate></pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Taylor, Jr.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PBS News Hour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impeachment/President Clinton]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>


				<description><![CDATA[<p>JIM LEHRER: And good morning from Washington. I'm Jim Lehrer. Welcome    to PBS's special NewsHour coverage of the House Judiciary Committee    hearings on the impeachment of President Clinton.</p>
<p>Today the President's attorneys begin a two-day defense presentation. We expect to hear from Gregory Craig, special assistant    to the President and special counsel and to Charles Ruff, the White    House counsel. As part of the presentation, they will call four panels    of witnesses over the next two days. We will be broadcasting today's    proceedings in full. The NewsHour's chief Washington correspondent,    Margaret Warner, is here with me this morning, and so are two commentators,    Stuart Taylor, a columnist for the <i>National Journal</i> and <i>Newsweek</i>    magazines and <i>Boston Globe</i> columnist Tom Oliphant.</p>
<p>JIM LEHRER: Tom, how would you characterize what is to happen here    today and tomorrow?</p>
<p>TOM    OLIPHANT: This is going to be a little weird on one level at least in    that we are going to see an actual defense on the law and the Constitution    and more on the facts than some people realize for two days against    charges that have yet to be made. Behind the scenes this committee's    Republican majority is working on the charges which have not yet been    presented in detail. But you will hear an actual defense with a beginning,    a middle, and an end.</p>
<p>JIM LEHRER: And there you see on the screen Congressman Henry Hyde,    the chairman of the committee, who said yesterday at a news conference    that he felt that the Republicans had made a compelling case for impeachment.    Stuart, what would you add to what Tom said about what this is about    these next two days?</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.stuarttaylorjr.com/content-newshour-impeachment-coverage-analysis-and-commentary-presidents-defense-2/">NewsHour Impeachment Coverage:  Analysis and Commentary &#8211; The President&#8217;s Defense</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.stuarttaylorjr.com">Stuart Taylor, Jr.</a>.</p>
]]></description>
					<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JIM LEHRER: And good morning from Washington. I&#8217;m Jim Lehrer. Welcome    to PBS&#8217;s special NewsHour coverage of the House Judiciary Committee    hearings on the impeachment of President Clinton.</p>
<p>Today the President&#8217;s attorneys begin a two-day defense presentation. We expect to hear from Gregory Craig, special assistant    to the President and special counsel and to Charles Ruff, the White    House counsel. As part of the presentation, they will call four panels    of witnesses over the next two days. We will be broadcasting today&#8217;s    proceedings in full. The NewsHour&#8217;s chief Washington correspondent,    Margaret Warner, is here with me this morning, and so are two commentators,    Stuart Taylor, a columnist for the <i>National Journal</i> and <i>Newsweek</i>    magazines and <i>Boston Globe</i> columnist Tom Oliphant.</p>
<p>JIM LEHRER: Tom, how would you characterize what is to happen here    today and tomorrow?</p>
<p>TOM    OLIPHANT: This is going to be a little weird on one level at least in    that we are going to see an actual defense on the law and the Constitution    and more on the facts than some people realize for two days against    charges that have yet to be made. Behind the scenes this committee&#8217;s    Republican majority is working on the charges which have not yet been    presented in detail. But you will hear an actual defense with a beginning,    a middle, and an end.</p>
<p>JIM LEHRER: And there you see on the screen Congressman Henry Hyde,    the chairman of the committee, who said yesterday at a news conference    that he felt that the Republicans had made a compelling case for impeachment.    Stuart, what would you add to what Tom said about what this is about    these next two days?</p>
<p>STUART TAYLOR: Well, I think the nature of the defense, it&#8217;s a little    confusing, because they have these three or four panels of witnesses,    but I think the essence    of it is they will be arguments that this is not impeachable conduct,    even if all the allegations against the President are true; that it    doesn&#8217;t rise to the level of impeachment. There will be scholars presenting    that. And former Attorney General Nicholas Katzenbach will be saying    that&#8217;s especially true when public opinion is against it and when the    impeachment be on a party-line vote. There will be arguments that this    is not the kind of conduct that &#8211; the kind of perjury for which people    are ordinarily prosecuted and maybe arguments that it&#8217;s not perjury    at all, even if all the allegations are true &#8211; the factual allegations.    And there will be attacks on the legitimacy of the process. Both Kenneth    Starr&#8217;s investigation &#8211; although that&#8217;s no longer the major theme &#8211;</p>
<p>JIM LEHRER: I thought they were going to back off that one.</p>
<p>STUART TAYLOR: And I think you&#8217;ll hear a little bit more trashing of    Mr. Starr. It won&#8217;t be Exhibit A, but it will be in there. And on the    legitimacy of the current partisan process in the House of Representatives,    one of the President&#8217;s witnesses, for example, Yale Law Professor Bruce    Ackerman, will say that a lame duck impeachment is not valid in the    next Congress.</p>
<p>JIM LEHRER: Would you expect, Tom, a serious attack on the process    by the Democrats?</p>
<p>TOM OLIPHANT: No. I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s going to be the emphasis. I    think the most important point or the most important thing the White    House wants to do today is to raise the stakes of this vote as high    as possible for the twenty-five to thirty-five people who have yet to    firmly make up their minds how they want to vote.</p>
<p>JIM LEHRER: Those are mostly moderate Republicans.</p>
<p>TOM OLIPHANT: To raise the stakes as high as they can as a constitutional    issue, as a factual issue, and even as a more narrow legal issue.</p>
<p>JIM LEHRER: Now, Margaret, let&#8217;s go through some of the players here.    First of all, Gregory Craig, who is the special counsel who was brought    in, what do we need to know about him?</p>
<p>MARGARET WARNER: Well, the most important thing we need to know about    Greg Craig is he was brought    in to a White House that &#8211; the impeachment defense basically in disarray    &#8211; that is, the political folks weren&#8217;t talking to the legal folks and    so on, and Greg Craig is supposed to quarterback and coordinate all    of this. He&#8217;s a longtime acquaintance of the Clintons from Yale Law    School days.</p>
<p>JIM LEHRER: And we&#8217;re about &#8211; here we go. Here we go with Chairman    Hyde.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.stuarttaylorjr.com/content-newshour-impeachment-coverage-analysis-and-commentary-presidents-defense-2/">NewsHour Impeachment Coverage:  Analysis and Commentary &#8211; The President&#8217;s Defense</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.stuarttaylorjr.com">Stuart Taylor, Jr.</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			

		<wfw:commentRss>https://www.stuarttaylorjr.com/content-newshour-impeachment-coverage-analysis-and-commentary-presidents-defense-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>