<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet href="https://www.stuarttaylorjr.com/wp-content/themes/getnoticed/inc/feeds/style.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Stuart Taylor, Jr.A Car Is Not a Pirate Ship &#8211; Stuart Taylor, Jr.</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.stuarttaylorjr.com/content-car-not-pirate-ship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.stuarttaylorjr.com</link>
	<description>Online Archive</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2021 13:35:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
		<item>
		<title>A Car Is Not a Pirate Ship</title>
		<link>https://www.stuarttaylorjr.com/content-car-not-pirate-ship/</link>
		<comments>https://www.stuarttaylorjr.com/content-car-not-pirate-ship/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate></pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Taylor, Jr.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impeachment/President Clinton]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuarttaylor.vivacreative.webfactional.com/?p=</guid>


				<description><![CDATA[<p>Indonesia-Lippo-Riady-Huang-Hub-bellgate. Taiwangate. Koreagate (II). Buddhist-Temple-Goregate. Filegate. Travelgate. Paulagate. Cisnerosgate Espygate.</p>
<p>Where to begin?</p>
<p>Some speculations: The man to watch will be Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr, who is still trying to build a case against the president or the first lady or both. The probability that Stair will accuse one or both of crimes seems below 50-50 at this point-but not by much. And there may be less noise than expected on the congressional front, given Republicans' fears of exposing their own dirty campaign finance laundry.</p>
<p>While a whole new <em>criminal</em> investigation may well find grist in the rivers of cash flowing from the Far East into Democratic campaign coffers-via Clinton cronies who freauented the White House-the greatest threat to the president is the same old scandal that many write off as too complicated to interest (or entertain) the public: Whitewater.</p>
<p>The central questions on which Starr's team of prosecutors seems to be focusing are whether either or both of the Clintons engaged in a criminal conspiracy with their now convicted former business partners, James and Susan McDougal, to avert bankruptcy for their Whitewater Development Corp. by keeping the McDougals' foundering Madison Guaranty Savings &#38; Loan afloat during the mid-1980s, and to obtain money by fraud from David Hale's Capital Management Services Inc.; and whether either or both of the Clintons have engaged ever since then in cover-up activities-both in Arkansas and in the White House-including destroying and secreting evidence, obstructing justice, and perjury.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.stuarttaylorjr.com/content-car-not-pirate-ship/">A Car Is Not a Pirate Ship</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.stuarttaylorjr.com">Stuart Taylor, Jr.</a>.</p>
]]></description>
					<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indonesia-Lippo-Riady-Huang-Hub-bellgate. Taiwangate. Koreagate (II). Buddhist-Temple-Goregate. Filegate. Travelgate. Paulagate. Cisnerosgate Espygate.</p>
<p>Where to begin?</p>
<p>Some speculations: The man to watch will be Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr, who is still trying to build a case against the president or the first lady or both. The probability that Stair will accuse one or both of crimes seems below 50-50 at this point-but not by much. And there may be less noise than expected on the congressional front, given Republicans&#8217; fears of exposing their own dirty campaign finance laundry.</p>
<p>While a whole new <em>criminal</em> investigation may well find grist in the rivers of cash flowing from the Far East into Democratic campaign coffers-via Clinton cronies who freauented the White House-the greatest threat to the president is the same old scandal that many write off as too complicated to interest (or entertain) the public: Whitewater.</p>
<p>The central questions on which Starr&#8217;s team of prosecutors seems to be focusing are whether either or both of the Clintons engaged in a criminal conspiracy with their now convicted former business partners, James and Susan McDougal, to avert bankruptcy for their Whitewater Development Corp. by keeping the McDougals&#8217; foundering Madison Guaranty Savings &amp; Loan afloat during the mid-1980s, and to obtain money by fraud from David Hale&#8217;s Capital Management Services Inc.; and whether either or both of the Clintons have engaged ever since then in cover-up activities-both in Arkansas and in the White House-including destroying and secreting evidence, obstructing justice, and perjury.</p>
<p>The main reason to doubt that the cautious Starr will pull the trigger is that he does not (yet) appear to have any very credible witnesses-let alone a smoking gun like the Nixon tapes-to document his evident suspicions that one or both Clintons may have crossed the line into criminality. And the Suspected crimes look relatively petty next to the crimes of Watergate.</p>
<p>The reason why Starr apparently has not ruled out seeking indictment of the first lady, or even impeachment of the president, is the cumulative weight of the evidence suggesting high-level cover-up activity on multiple fronts.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Starr has obtained James McDougal&#8217;s cooperation and is seeking that of the jailed but so-far-defiant Susan McDougal and others. The others include ailing, convicted former Gov. Jim Guy Tucker and perhaps convicted Clinton crony Webster Hubbell-who may know more than he&#8217;s disclosed so far about some things, including Hillary Rodham Clinton&#8217;s legal work involving Hubbell&#8217;s father-in-law, Seth Ward, on the McDougals&#8217; corrupt Castle Grande real estate deal; and a reported $250,000 in fees paid to Hubbell by the Clinton-connected Riady family&#8217;s Lippo Group <em>after </em>Hubbell was driven in disgrace from his job as the president&#8217;s associate attorney general.</p>
<p>The president has dismissed the Starr investigation as an &quot;obvious&quot; political vendetta that has failed to turn up &quot;a single solitary shred&quot; of evidence incriminating him or his wife-while refusing to rule out pardoning the McDougals and other potential witnesses against him.</p>
<p>Among the outstanding questions:</p>
<p>&bull;	Did then Gov. Clinton have guilty knowledge of the clearly fraudulent $300,000 federally subsidized loan that&#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.stuarttaylorjr.com/content-car-not-pirate-ship/">A Car Is Not a Pirate Ship</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.stuarttaylorjr.com">Stuart Taylor, Jr.</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			

		<wfw:commentRss>https://www.stuarttaylorjr.com/content-car-not-pirate-ship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>